Buying or Selling a Condo in Florida? Be Prepared!

Posted on August 3, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

A New Federal Mortgage Bombshell Could Turn Florida Condo Buying & Selling Into Pure Chaos 

 

This article was shared by Leon Behar. You can view it on NewsBreak. A full transcription follows, preceded with a summary prepared by Claude (Anthropic) for Aquarius community members short on time.      https://share.newsbreak.com/j6r3rmr0?s=i6

Abstract

Starting today (August 3, 2026), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are replacing streamlined condo loan reviews with full, in-depth reviews of building finances, insurance, structural inspections, and reserve funding. The change stems from stricter safety and reserve laws passed after the 2021 Surfside condo collapse, and it’s expected to slow closings, increase paperwork, and lead to more loan denials — especially in Florida, which has over 1.5 million condo units concentrated in fast-moving coastal markets like Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach.

Lenders will now scrutinize structural reports, reserve studies, maintenance records, and compliance with Florida’s inspection laws. Buildings that fall short could be labeled “unwarrantable,” pushing buyers toward larger down payments or alternative financing. Adding pressure, associations must meet new reserve funding minimums (15% of budgets) starting January 4, 2027.

The bottom line: buyers, sellers, and condo boards will need more documentation and patience, with well-maintained, financially healthy buildings faring better than aging or underfunded ones.

Final death toll from Florida condominium collapse put at 98 | Reuters

  • Filed DispatchBroadsheet Edition

A New Federal Mortgage Bombshell Could Turn Florida Condo Buying & Selling Into Pure Chaos

Edmond Thorne

💬36❤️65↗️548

New Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rules demand deeper looks at association finances and reserves, raising fears of slower closings and more loan turn-downs across the Sunshine State

*This article was created, researched, and developed entirely without any use of AI.

By Senior Staff Writer, Edmond Thorne for OmniCom MultiMedia

Florida News Network: Tallahassee —If you are buying or selling a condo in Florida, brace yourself. Starting August 3, 2026, mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are ditching the quick, simplified loan reviews that many condo buyers have relied on for years. From now on, most condo sales will go through a full, top-to-bottom review of the entire building’s finances, insurance, and upkeep. Sounds boring? It is anything but. This change could mean longer waits, more paperwork, and yes, more denied loans for Floridians trying to close on a home.

For a state with more than 1.5 million condominium units, according to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, the impact could be massive. Many Floridians rely on conventional loans backed by Fannie and Freddie, especially in coastal counties where condos dominate the housing landscape. So, when the rules change, the ripple effects reach everyone.

Why The Rules Are Changing:

The new requirements didn’t appear out of thin air. They follow years of heightened concern about building safety and financial stability in condo communities. After the 2021 collapse of the Champlain Towers South in Surfside, state lawmakers passed stricter inspection and reserve funding laws. Those laws forced associations to confront long‑delayed repairs and rising costs.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac say the updated standards are meant to protect homeowners from buying into buildings with hidden issues. Their announcements explain that lenders must now collect more documentation, including details about structural integrity, reserve funds, maintenance history, and any outstanding safety violations. The goal is to reduce the chance that a buyer ends up in a building facing major repairs or financial trouble.

What Lenders Will Be Looking For:

  • Under the new rules, lenders must review:
  • Structural inspection reports
  • Reserve studies and reserve balances
  • Maintenance records
  • Any known building defects or safety concerns
  • Whether the association is following Florida’s mandatory inspection and reserve laws

This is far more than the traditional questionnaire lenders have used for years. Some lenders say the new process could require weeks of back‑and‑forth with condo boards, property managers, and engineers.

One South Florida mortgage broker told the Miami Herald that associations already struggle to keep up with documentation requests. Adding more layers, he said, could slow approvals and frustrate buyers who are eager to close.

The Fear Of Delays & Denials:

Experts warn that the biggest challenge may be timing. Florida’s condo market moves fast, especially in places like Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties. Buyers often expect quick closings. Sellers want certainty. But if lenders need extra time to review documents, the entire process could drag. There’s also the risk of outright denials. If a lender finds that a building doesn’t meet Fannie or Freddie’s underwriting standards, the buyer may be forced to switch to a different loan type or walk away. That could leave sellers scrambling to find new buyers and buyers scrambling to find new homes.

Real estate attorneys say they’re already preparing clients for the possibility that some entire buildings and developments will be flagged as “unwarrantable,” meaning they don’t qualify for conventional financing. When that happens, buyers may need larger down payments or more expensive loan options. Here is where it gets personal for condo owners’ wallets. Starting January 4, 2027, associations will need to put at least 15 percent of their annual budgets toward reserves and follow the highest recommended funding levels from their reserve studies, since bare minimum funding methods will no longer be allowed.

Condo Associations Under Pressure:

Condo boards and property managers will feel the heat too. Associations that don’t keep detailed records or haven’t completed required inspections may find themselves at a disadvantage. Florida’s condo laws already require milestone inspections and reserve studies for many buildings. But compliance varies, especially in older communities with tight budgets.

If an association hasn’t completed its required inspections or doesn’t have enough money set aside for repairs, lenders may see that as a red flag. This could push associations to update their records, complete overdue inspections, or raise fees to build reserves. Those steps can be costly, and owners may feel the financial strain. Nobody enjoys a surprise bill in the mail, but skipping this step could be worse. It could mean owners cannot sell, and buyers cannot get a loan at all.

Buyers And Sellers Trying To Make Sense Of It All:
For everyday Floridians, the changes raise tough questions. Will their building qualify for financing? Will their sale fall apart? Will they need to pay more for repairs or reserves? Some real estate agents say they’re already adjusting their strategies. They’re encouraging sellers to gather association documents early and advising buyers to ask more questions before making offers.

Buyers may also start favoring buildings with strong financials and recent inspections. Sellers in older or poorly funded buildings may need to prepare for longer listing times or lower offers. Community management experts are already warning boards to get their paperwork in order now. Communities that are not prepared could face delayed closings or outright loan denials that hurt owners and drag down property values across the whole building.

Could This Make Condos Harder To Sell:

Many experts believe the market will adjust, but not without bumps. Florida’s condo market has always been complex, especially with hurricane risks, insurance challenges, and aging buildings. These new lending rules add another layer. Some analysts say the changes could push buyers toward newer buildings or single-family homes.

Others believe the added transparency will help stabilize the market by steering buyers toward safer, better-managed communities. Still, the transition period may be rocky. Mortgage delays can cause deals to fall apart. Associations may struggle to meet documentation demands. And buyers may feel overwhelmed by the extra steps.

Florida Forward:

Florida has more condos than almost any state, and many are aging while insurance costs have soared and reserve rules have tightened. The March 2026 package tries to ease the insurance squeeze with actual cash value roofs and a 50000 dollar deductible cap, while tightening financial health checks with Full Review and higher reserves. In the near term, expect more paperwork and more lender questions.

For buyers, the key question is not just can I afford this unit, but can this building afford itself? For sellers and boards, the key question is: can we prove it on paper today? Buildings that can answer yes will keep low-cost financing and more buyers. Buildings that cannot will see a smaller pool, even if the view is still perfect. For buyers and sellers, patience and preparation will matter more than ever. The condo market is not disappearing; it is just growing up, and Florida, given everything this state has already been through, may need that more than anywhere else in the country.

.o0o.

Posted in Social | Leave a comment

Nathan Weistein discords Arkady Chase assessment of Aquarius North Tower humidity and temperature levels

Posted on July 26, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

Nathan Weistein discords Arkady Chase assessment of Aquarius North Tower humidity and temperature levels

Arkady Chase wrote several notes regarding the humidity and temperature in the hallways of the Aquarius North Tower. Here are some of Mr. Chase’s notes regarding the issue. Nathan Weinstein believes that these observations are incorrect.

June 2, 2026

June 19, 2026

July 6, 2026

 

Response to Mr. Chase’s Comments Regarding North Tower Corridor Humidity

July 16, 2026.

Dear Board Members and Fellow Owners,

I have carefully reviewed Mr. Chase’s recent response regarding the North Tower corridor humidity issue. While I appreciate his concern regarding the condition of the building, I believe several conclusions in his response are presented as established facts without supporting documentation, engineering analysis, or independent verification. I therefore offer the following comments for the Board’s and owners’ consideration.

  1. Assertions Regarding Building History: Mr. Chase states that the North Tower did not experience persistent humidity problems prior to the installation of the rooftop HVAC equipment around 2015 and describes this as a matter of building history. However, no maintenance records, engineering reports, historical humidity data, or documented statements from long-term residents have been presented to substantiate this conclusion. Likewise, no documented evidence has been provided establishing that a corridor humidity problem began immediately following the 2015 installation. If elevated corridor humidity has existed continuously since 2015, it is reasonable to ask whether there are historical records documenting that condition, including owner complaints, Board discussions, maintenance records, or engineering evaluations during that period. To date, presented photographs showing humidity and temperature reading, has been presented without identifying the date, exact location, or testing conditions. Such limited information is insufficient by itself to establish a long-term building-wide condition.
  2. Florida Statute 718.113: I fully agree that the Association has a statutory responsibility under Florida Statute 718.113 to maintain, repair, and replace common elements, including HVAC systems, when necessary. However, the statute does not establish a specific corridor humidity requirement, nor does it require that corridor humidity be maintained below 60 percent relative humidity. The commonly referenced 60 percent relative humidity value is generally associated with industry guidance/recommendation–it is not, by itself, a statutory requirement contained within Florida Statute 718.113. Whether the Association has fulfilled its maintenance obligation depends upon the actual condition and performance of the HVAC system, as determined through appropriate evaluation, documentation, and professional analysis.
  3. Engineering Conclusions Require Engineering Evidence: Several statements contained in Mr. Chase’s letter appear to represent engineering conclusions rather than established facts. For example, he states or implies that: the 2015 rooftop HVAC system or installed AHU unit are the cause of the corridor humidity issue and that repairing or replacing the rooftop equipment alone will resolve the condition, other possible contributing factors can be excluded. Those are not professional opinions. Based on documents the previous old system, Aquarius had before 2015, experienced similar problems we have today with new system. Therefore it is reasonable to say there are other factors contributing to issues we experience with HVAC systems: HVAC equipment design; equipment operation or maintenance; building pressurization; air distribution; occupancy patterns; uncontrolled flow of outside air into a building, or conditioned air out of it or a combination of these factors. Determining the actual cause requires evaluation by a qualified mechanical engineering professional rather than assumptions and demands.
  4. ASHRAE Standards: Mr. Chase states that documented humidity levels have been approximately 70 percent and that these levels exceed ASHRAE recommendations. However, no comprehensive humidity records identifying measurement locations, dates, duration of testing, instrumentation used, or testing methodology have been provided to support this statement. ASHRAE standards generally provide engineering guidance regarding comfort, indoor environmental quality, and system design. They do not automatically establish legal requirements for every existing condominium corridor. Similarly, there is no Florida law stating that replacement of HVAC equipment automatically requires compliance with unspecified “modern operational performance standards.” Whether a replacement system complies with applicable requirements depends upon the approved design documents, permits, codes, and engineering criteria applicable at the time the work was performed.
  5. Corridor HVAC Outage: If the corridor HVAC equipment was inoperative for several months, as stated, and was in fact documented by management, that condition could certainly have contributed to elevated temperature and humidity levels during that period. However, a temporary equipment failure does not by itself establish that the original system design was defective or that complete replacement of the rooftop equipment is currently required. It is my understanding that management, based on reporting and acknowledgements emailed to community, has continued making reasonable efforts to maintain and repair the existing equipment whenever practical in both buildings. It is important to mention that each tower has tandem (2) chillers and 4 compressors. That means for system to be completely down all compressors should not work. My understanding is this was not a case, and although not at 100%, HVAC system was partially operating than, which means there was sufficient fresh and conditioned air supply in corridors.
  6. Clarification Regarding My Preliminary Cost Estimate: Mr. Chase criticized my discussion of potential HVAC replacement costs. For clarification, my estimate was never presented as a final construction cost or engineering estimate. It was intended solely as an illustrative planning estimate to help owners understand the possible financial magnitude should major HVAC modifications ultimately become necessary. My professional background includes many years as an estimator and project manager for a mechanical contractor company specializing in HVAC systems. My responsibilities included preparing construction estimates, developing project budgets, and managing HVAC installation and renovation projects for schools, municipal buildings, hospitals, and other commercial facilities. My preliminary budget estimate was based primarily upon a mechanical contractor’s estimate provided approximately 3 years ago for replacement of one rooftop air-handling unit. Considering current increased material costs, labor escalation, structural requirements, roofing modifications, electrical work, helicopter lifting services, testing and balancing, permitting, and other associated construction activities, I believe the replacement cost of one rooftop air handling unit could reasonably approach approximately $1.2 million. If a consulting engineer ultimately determines that Energy Recovery Units (ERUs) or other significant modifications are required, the overall project cost could increase accordingly. Actual construction costs can only be determined after a licensed engineer completes an evaluation, prepares design documents, and competitive bids are obtained from qualified contractors. Preparing preliminary planning budgets has been a routine part of my professional responsibilities and serves only to assist owners in understanding potential future financial obligations.
  7. My Field Measurements: On July 10, 2026, 3:00PM I conducted field measurements after I received new PROTMЕХ HT607, calibrated handheld hygrometer/thermometer, at several locations on multiple floors of the North Tower. The purpose of these measurements was to obtain current field data regarding actual corridor environmental conditions. These readings represent conditions at the time of testing and are not intended to replace a long-term environmental monitoring study.

Floor 3: at Apartment #1: 55.0% RH — 76.6°F;at Elevator Lobby: 58.3% RH — 77.2°F;at Apartment #5: 60.7% RH -74.9°F

Floor 12:at Apartment #1: 63.0% RH —72.5°F;at Elevator Lobby: 63.8% RH — 75.6°F;at Apartment #5: 63.0% RH — 73.7°F

Penthouse Floor:at Apartment #1: 64.1% RH — 76.3°F;at Elevator Lobby: 64.3% RH — 75.6°F;at Apartment#4: 60.2% RH — 75.1°F

These measurements indicate that, at the time of testing, the corridor environmental conditions did not demonstrate an uncontrolled or extreme humidity condition. However, additional long-term monitoring would be appropriate if the Board determines that further evaluation is necessary.

Conclusion: Several statements in Mr. Chase’s letter appear inconsistent with available historical information and have not been supported by documentation or engineering analysis. Contrary to Mr. Chase opinion stating that issues just started after 2015 new unit was installed, there are unit owners who remember the issues with HVAC equipment were common before 2015. There are also records which prove HVAC system experienced operational and maintenance issues problems while Mr. Chase was on the Board of Directors. I assume because HVAC system was failing then, the decision was made to replace it by installing a new AHU’s. Please see documents attached to this letter stating continuous problems with AHU’s serving corridors before 2015. I am not aware whether a consulting engineering firm was involved in evaluating and selecting the current replacement equipment. However, based on its operating history, including component failures and delays associated with obtaining replacement parts, the current replacement unit has presented reliability and maintenance challenges. The equipment was manufactured by a Canadian company, and several components have required replacement over the years. Because replacement parts have not always been readily available, procurement and delivery have sometimes taken considerable time. During these periods, the corridor HVAC systems had not been operating at 100%, which could result in increased temperature and humidity levels until repairs were completed. It is also noteworthy that approximately 10 years after installation of the current HVAC unit, Mr. Chase began to complain regarding corridor temperature and humidity conditions, including requests that the unit be replaced and statements that the matter might be reported to Association’s Insurance Carrier and government authorities. The temperature and humidity measurements obtained on July 10, 2026, at three different locations on three separate floors indicate that corridor environmental conditions were within reasonable ranges at the time of testing. These measurements support the conclusion that no uncontrolled humidity condition was demonstrated on the date measurements were taken. No mechanical HVAC system is expected to operate without occasional maintenance or repairs. Therefore, decisions regarding replacement of the existing corridor HVAC system should be based on documented engineering evaluations, equipment reliability, maintenance history, life-cycle costs, and objective performance data. I agree that the corridor humidity issue deserves careful evaluation if the community believes a persistent problem exists. However, before significant expenditures or major HVAC modifications are considered, I believe the Board should first obtain an independent evaluation by a qualified mechanical engineering firm, if community decided to do it, not based on opinion of just one person. That evaluation should identify the actual cause of the reported humidity conditions, determine whether the existing system is capable of achieving its intended design performance, and recommend the most practical and cost-effective corrective action. Only after such an engineering assessment is completed should the Board determine whether repairs, equipment replacement, or other modifications are justified. Until then, the community should distinguish between established facts, professional engineering, HVAC vendors conclusions, and individual opinions.

Respectfully,

Nathan Weinstein

Attachement:

1.From: Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:01:27 +0000 To: ; ; Subject: RE: Compressors Well, does that explain why the hallways are warm?? We signed the agreement with Carrier to come out and do a full inspection. Let’s see what they have to say. If it is a replacement, let’s get bids for the rebuild and replacement work, the warranties on both and go from there. Not operating for a week is an issue. I recommend we add auxiliary switches on the contactors so we know the status of the contactor. We should be able to at least get the contactor status signaled to us. We should think about adding monitoring equipment that we can send data to the office. Thanks, 2.From: Arkady [mailto:arkady.chase@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:49 PM To: aquariusmgr@comcast.net; Subject: Compressors I just spoke with an Air Management technician David, who fixed and started Compressor #1 in the South building. So far so good. However, I went up with him to the North Tower compressor room, where one of the compressors was apparently not working for almost a week. David tried to start it, but then suggested that based on the sound of it, and a pattern of operation, the compressor is broken and needs to be replaced (or rebuilt). We have so far two alternatives: to go with Air Management, or engage Carrier. In either case, we most likely are looking to spend a substantial sum of money. Arkady, 3.From: Arkady Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:09 PM To: Cc: Subject: Compressor for North Tower Let’s proceed with the compressor change. It is very hot in the hallways. Arkady, 4.From: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:49 AM To: Jerry Chambers-Aquarius Manager Cc: Arkady; Subject: Re: Compressor for North Tower Hi! Jerry Did we pay Carrier the proposed $3500? Will it be a NEW or reconditioned compressor? Thanks for bringing cost down, anything helps. Think it has to be done Thanks. Sent from my iPad On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:39, “Jerry Chambers-Aquarius Manager” wrote: Dear Board Members: I went back to Air Management and was able to negotiate some credits on the previous work on the compressors for the two towers. The original proposal to replace the North Tower compressor that is broken came in at $12,802.00. With the negotiated credits, the new cost is $11,429.09 and includes the superheat resetting to prolong the life of the compressor. I recommend that we move forward on this item as we have heard nothing back from Carrier. Jerry M. Chambers, LCAM Aquarius Condominium 2751 S Ocean Dr Hollywood, FL 33019 O: 954 921-7924 Fax 954-921-9768, 5. From: Brian Seidler, LCAM Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:48 PM To: Cc: Subject: South Building A/C Compressors Importance: High Good afternoon Board: Arkady Chase Bob Dolan from Airstron sent a technician named Craig out to troubleshoot our two compressors that were found to be inoperable in the south building. Compressor # 1, on the right when you enter the room was found with a blown circuit. The part was removed from compressor # 2 and # 1 was returned to service. Compressor # 2 was found to have shut down as designed with a low pressure alarm. The unit was found with no gas as it had leaked from a line fracture. This fracture is believed to have been caused by vibration. Proposals to repair both units and return them to service are being generated by Bob Dolan and will be received soon. Thank you. Brian Seidler, LCAM Property Manager Aquarius Condominium Association, Inc. 2751 South Ocean Drive Hollywood, FL 33019 Office: 954-921-7924 Fax: 954-921-9768 Celluar: 954-559-4911 http://www.aquariuscondo.net Professionally managed by Blue Crest Management “Prudent, Professional, Performance” http://www.bluecrestmanagement.com From: Brian Seidler, LCAM Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 7:53 PM To: Cc: Subject: South Tower COmpressor #1 Importance: High Arkady Chase Dear Board: I just met with Craig, the Airstron technician sent out to address our compressor issue. The fuse that he repaired yesterday blew again overnight taking the unit out of service. Craig came back this morning and was able to trace a wiring issue and repair it. Thank you. Brian Seidler, LCAМ Property Manager Aquarius Condominium Association, Inc. 2751 South Ocean Drive Hollywood, FL 33019 Office: 954-921-7924 Fax: 954-921-9768 Celluar: 954-559-4911 http://www.aquariuscondo.net Professionally managed by Blue Crest Management “Prudent, Professional, Performance” http://www.bluecrestmanagement.com From: Brian Seidler, LCAM Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 8:13 PM To: Cc: Subject: Compressors Importance: High Good afternoon Bob: Arkady Chase Can you advise when we will receive the repair proposals based upon your technician Craig’s inspection last week of the HVAC compressors that are inoperable? I am receiving numerous complaints of how hot it is in the hallways. Many elderly residents have expressed concern over their respiratory issues being complicated by the lack of cool air. It is important that we address this sooner than later. Thank you sir. Brian Seidler, LCAM Property Manager Aquarius Condominium Association, Inc. 2751 South Ocean Drive Hollywood, FL 33019 Office: 954-921-7924 Fax: 954-921-9768 Celluar: 954-559-4911 http://www.aquariuscondo.net Professionally managed by Blue Crest Management “Prudent, Professional, Performance” http://www.bluecrestmanagement.com From: Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 5:14 PM To: Jeff Levine- Chief engineer Subject: Re: north tower a/c Thank you Jeff. Sent from my iPad On Jul 23, 2014, at 10:38 AM, “Jeff Levine- Chief engineer” wrote: With pyke mechanical we finished the expansion valves on #2 ahu,its now working perfectly, we realized that the one of the compressors that was on by itself the hole time was not cycling properlyunloading. We found that the phase controller was not wired properly, no parts were needed but a couple of hours of labor was,its now cycling properly.When you have multiple issues from shotty prior work the only way to get up and running is to work one problem at a time.we have a good amount of labor envolved in the north tower,the compressor was taken apart all over the floor, one air handler was missing a motor,squirrel cage broken, no Freon, oilect.ect., it took alittle time to evaluate everything,get supplies, labor, we have 72 degrees in the hallways and everything is working properly….

.o0o.

When all else fails, laugh it off.


.o0o.

Posted in Amenities, Improvements | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

7 South Florida restaurants we lost in June-July 2026 Should Acqua Bristo be the next?

Posted on July 20, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

7 South Florida restaurants we lost in June-July 2026 Should Aquarius Condo. Acqua Bristo be the next?

Check this article from Sun Sentinel. The Restaurants closing around us. Should we let Acqua Bistro go away?

_____________________________________________________
Restaurants, Food and Drink |7 South Florida restaurants we lost in…

7 South Florida restaurants we lost in June-July 2026

Grease Burger Beer and Whiskey Bar, known for 10-ounce prime patties and craft beers in downtown West Palm Beach, permanently closed on July 17. (Big Time Restaurant Group/Courtesy)
Big Time Restaurant Group / Courtesy

Grease Burger Beer and Whiskey Bar, known for 10-ounce prime patties and craft beers in downtown West Palm Beach, permanently closed on July 17. (Big Time Restaurant Group/Courtesy)

Phillip Valys, Sun Sentinel reporter.Sun Sentinel entertainment reporter Rod Stafford Hagwood.

By  | pvalys@sunsentinel.com | South Florida Sun Sentinel and  | South Florida Sun Sentinel
PUBLISHED: 
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…

Losing a treasured longtime restaurant is never easy. Here, we say goodbye to seven eateries that recently shut down in Broward and Palm Beach counties.

Matchbox, 1860 Sawgrass Mills Circle, No. 5100, Sunrise: Known for its brick-oven pizzas, elevated bistro entrees and craft cocktails, this casual dining restaurant — which opened in 2017 at Sawgrass Mills mall — was part of the Thompson Hospitality collection of restaurants (which includes YOT Bar & Kitchen, Wiseguy Pizza and South Bar & Kitchen). “After many years serving the Sunrise community, we’ve made the decision to close our Matchbox Sawgrass Mills location,” chief operating officer Alex Berentzen said via email. “We’re grateful to our guests, team members, and the local community for their support over the years.” CLOSED: July 1, per public relations firm.

Grease Burger, Beer and Whiskey Bar, 213 Clematis St., West Palm Beach: A brick-lined gastropub retreat with meat hooks hanging from the ceiling (a nod to New York’s Meatpacking District), this hamburger haven announced its “last call” after 20 years through social media. The downtown stop from Big Time Restaurant Group (whose City Cellar Wine Bar & Grill at CityPlace also shut in May) served items such as Garbage Can Nachos and 10-ounce prime burgers (the Brinkman with deep-fried bacon was a must-order), plus a dizzying rotation of craft ales and lagers. CLOSED: July 17, according to  a Facebook video.

Grande’s Bella Cucina, 4580 Donald Ross Road, No. 119, Palm Beach Gardens: This longtime Italian taverna in the upscale Shops of Donald Ross Village was known for Black Angus meatballs, pies and Italian classics from veal chops to tiramisu. Owners Graziella and Giuseppe Luppino opened their SoFlo restaurant in February 2007 after operating the original location in New York, according to its website, which is now deactivated. CLOSED: July 2, said Graziella Luppino via email.

ROK, 4954 N. University Drive, Lauderhill: This all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue bastion serving prime cuts on tabletop grills has shut its flagship after 15 years in the University Shoppes plaza, co-owner Eugenie Kwon told the Sun Sentinel. “We are truly grateful for the trust, loyalty and friendships in the past 15 years of business at our first location,” Kwon posted in the Sun Sentinel’s foodie Facebook page, “Let’s Eat South Florida Facebook.” Kwon, who ran ROK with her chef husband Michael Kwon, confirmed their Boynton Beach location remains open. CLOSED: June 18, according to Eugenie Kwon.

The bar at Mexican restaurant El Vez, which permanently closed in June, inside the W Fort Lauderdale hotel. (STARR Restaurants / Courtesy)
STARR Restaurants / Courtesy

The bar at Mexican restaurant El Vez, which closed in June inside the W Fort Lauderdale hotel. (Starr Restaurants/Courtesy)

El Vez (at the W Fort Lauderdale), 401 N. Fort Lauderdale Beach Blvd., Fort Lauderdale: Restaurateur Stephen Starr’s baja-style Mexican sit-down inside the W has quietly shuttered after eight years on the doorstep of the Atlantic Ocean, luxury hotel spokesperson Stella Fisher told the South Florida Sun Sentinel. An offshoot of Starr’s El Vez original in Philadelphia (which remains in business), the restaurant paired salty ocean breezes with salt-rimmed margaritas, plus snapper chicharrónes, frito pie burritos and crispy mahi-mahi tacos. This fall, the 12,000-square-foot space is expected to become Motek by the Sea, the newest location by the rising Israeli-Mediterranean chain from Miami. CLOSED: June 22, per Fisher.

Livia Bar & Grill, 500 N. Andrews Ave., No. 106, Fort Lauderdale: Billed as a “trendy modern-Italian eatery,” Livia opened in 2023 within the Motif mixed-use apartment building on the western edge of the busy-buzzy Flagler Village neighborhood. It was owned by Licata Hospitality, which also operates Hugh’s Catering. “Livia Bar & Grill’s closure was a strategic business decision tied to the sale and transition of the restaurant space to a new operator,” said Steve Nothnagel, director of operations, by email. “We are proud of what we created at Livia and are deeply grateful to our hardworking team, loyal guests, and the Flagler Village community for their support. The restaurant built a strong following, hosted many memorable events, and became a truly special place for our family and staff.” CLOSED: June 28, according to Nothnagel.

Livia Bar & Grill's team and some of their regular guests on the last day of operation, Sunday, June 28, 2026. (Livia Bar & Grill/Courtesy)
Livia Bar & Grill

Livia Bar & Grill’s team and some of their regular guests on June 28, the last day of operation. (Livia Bar & Grill/Courtesy)

Vienna Wine Bar, 9100 W. State Road 84, Davie: Tucked away within the Ridge Plaza shopping center, this restaurant has changed hands twice. It most recently was taken over by John Daly, who is working with chef/co-owner Carlos Estevez to reimagine the space for a fall opening. “It’s going to be a real American-themed steakhouse,” Daly told the Sun Sentinel. “This year, we celebrate America 250. It’s a nice celebration of America. And we think that the steak dinner is a celebration that people get together around a table, they celebrate either a promotion at work, maybe getting good grades or something good that happens in life. So we kind of want to bring the two concepts together and make a very unique restaurant where people feel like they’re part of something.” CLOSED: July 9, per Daly.

Vienna Wine Bar in Davie shuttered Thursday, July 9. According to the food & beverage venue's new owners, John Daly and chef Carlos Estevez, the space will become a steakhouse sometime this fall. (Rod Stafford Hagwood/South Florida Sun Sentinel)
Rod Stafford Hagwood/South Florida Sun Sentinel

Vienna Wine Bar was tucked away within Davie’s Ridge Plaza shopping center. (Rod Stafford Hagwood/South Florida Sun Sentinel)

 

 

Posted in Amenities, Social | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Proposed Aquarius Board Records Policy Conflicts with Florida Legal Requirements

Posted on July 7, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

Proposed Aquarius Board Records Policy Conflicts with Florida Legal Requirements

 

Summary of Key Issues Identified

Arkady Chase, Ph5N, reviewed the draft policy proposed by the Aquarius Board and concluded that several provisions conflict with Florida Statute §718.111(12) and DBPR enforcement practices, creating potential legal and regulatory exposure for the Association.

Major Concerns

  • Statutory deadlines cannot be delayed. The 10‑business‑day clock starts upon any written request, regardless of format or completeness. The draft incorrectly attempts to postpone this.
  • Restrictions on delivery methods are unlawful. Email or any written communication triggers statutory obligations; certified mail cannot be required.
  • Overly narrow request requirements. Owners may request broad categories of records; the Association cannot demand narrowly tailored descriptions.
  • Limits on inspection frequency are not allowed. Restricting owners to one inspection every ten business days violates the statute and is considered an unreasonable restriction.
  • Deposits or certifications before scheduling are improper. These conditions are not supported by law and would likely be viewed as barriers to access.
  • Definitions of repetitive requests are too broad. Owners may re‑inspect records without justification; consolidation cannot delay access.
  • In‑person‑only inspection rules are too restrictive. DBPR encourages electronic copies when records are digital; the Association cannot refuse to email electronic documents.
  • Appointment scheduling cannot cause delay. “Mutually agreeable” scheduling cannot extend access beyond the statutory 10‑day deadline.
  • Conduct rules must be narrowly applied. Disruptive behavior can be prohibited, but photographing or scanning records cannot be banned.
  • Legal counsel involvement cannot slow access. Counsel may coordinate but cannot impose extra requirements or cause delays.

Overall Assessment

The draft policy is detailed but exceeds the Association’s legal authority in several areas. The most significant risks involve:

  • delaying statutory deadlines,
  • imposing additional conditions on owners,
  • restricting inspection frequency.

Arkady Chase recommends revising the policy to ensure full compliance with §718.111(12) and DBPR interpretations to avoid complaints, fines, statutory damages, and attorney’s fees.

________________________________________

Here is the full, unabridged note from Arkady Chase (PH5N):

Please find my thoughts on the proposed “Official Records Request Protocol & Procedures.” These comments focus on statutory compliance, DBPR enforcement positions, and areas where the draft may unintentionally expose the Association to legal or regulatory risk.

1. Ten‑Day Statutory Deadline Cannot Be Delayed

The draft states that the ten‑business‑day period “shall not begin until all request requirements are satisfied.” This is inconsistent with Florida Statute §718.111(12). The statutory clock begins upon receipt of any written request, regardless of format or completeness. DBPR has repeatedly fined associations for attempting to delay the start of the deadline.

2. Delivery Method Restrictions Are Overly Limiting

While certified mail is the preferred method, the Association cannot condition statutory rights on its use. Any written request—including email—triggers the statutory deadline. The current language risks being interpreted as obstructive.

3. Overly Narrow Request Requirements

The policy requires a “specific and narrowly tailored description” of requested records. Owners are legally permitted to request broad categories (e.g., “all financial records for 2023”). DBPR has held that associations cannot reject or delay requests because they are not narrow enough.

4. Limiting Inspections to One Every Ten Business Days Is Not Permitted

The draft includes a guideline limiting owners to one inspection appointment per ten business days. Florida law does not authorize such a restriction. Any rule that “unreasonably restricts” access is void under §718.112(3).

5. Deposits and Certifications Before Scheduling Inspections Are Problematic

Requiring refundable deposits or written certifications that a request is not duplicative is not supported by statute. DBPR would likely view these provisions as unlawful barriers to access.

6. Serial or Repetitive Request Definitions Are Too Broad

The policy defines repetitive requests in a way that could capture legitimate follow‑up inspections. Owners are entitled to re‑inspect records, and the Association cannot require them to justify why. Consolidation of requests is permissible only if it does not delay access.

7. In‑Person Inspection Only May Be Too Restrictive

While the statute guarantees the right to inspect in person, DBPR encourages associations to provide electronic copies when records are already digital. The Association cannot refuse to email documents that exist in electronic form.

8. Appointment Scheduling Must Not Delay Access

The policy requires “mutually agreeable” appointment times. If this results in delay beyond ten business days, the Association would be in violation. The obligation to meet the statutory deadline is absolute.

9. Conduct Rules Are Generally Lawful but Must Be Narrowly Applied

Prohibiting disruptive behavior is appropriate. However, the Association cannot prohibit photographing or scanning the records themselves, only the recording of staff conversations.

10. Legal Counsel Involvement Cannot Delay Access

Routing requests through counsel is permissible, but counsel cannot impose additional requirements or cause delay beyond the statutory deadline.Overall Assessment

The policy is detailed and well‑intentioned, but several provisions exceed the Association’s statutory authority and could expose the Association to DBPR complaints, statutory damages, and attorney’s fees. The most significant risks involve delaying the statutory deadline, imposing additional conditions on owners, and restricting the frequency of inspections.

I recommend revising the policy to ensure full compliance with §718.111(12) and DBPR interpretations.

Arkady Chase, PH5N

.o0o.

Posted in Social | Leave a comment

Correction of Misstatements Regarding Corridor Humidity and Required Board Action

Posted on July 6, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

 

Correction of Misstatements Regarding Corridor Humidity and Required Board Action

 

Dear Board Members and Fellow Owners, by Arkady Chase

I am writing to correct several significant inaccuracies contained in Mr. Weinstein’s recent public post regarding the North Tower corridor humidity problem. Because his comments were published on AquariusUno.com, it is necessary to provide owners with accurate information and to clearly outline the Association’s obligations.

Although Mr. Weinstein resides in the South Tower, he made assertions about conditions in the North Tower, where the humidity problem has been persistent, documented, and directly experienced by residents.

1. The North Tower did not have persistent humidity problems before the 2015 HVAC installation For more than forty years prior to the installation of the current rooftop HVAC system (installed around 2015), the North Tower corridors did not experience sustained humidity issues. The elevated humidity began only after the current system was installed. This is a matter of building history, not opinion.

2. The Association has a non‑discretionary legal duty to correct HVAC failures Under Florida Statute §718.113, the Association must maintain, repair, and replace common‑element HVAC systems. This duty is mandatory. It is not subject to owner votes, feasibility studies, or cost‑avoidance arguments. If the corridor HVAC system is failing, the Board is legally required to correct the failure.

3. Modern humidity standards apply to the 2015 system The suggestion that modern humidity‑control standards do not apply because the building is 53 years old is incorrect. When HVAC equipment is replaced—as it was in 2015—the replacement system must meet current operational performance standards. These are not “new‑construction standards”; they are basic requirements for any functioning mechanical system.

4. The issue is humidity, not temperature The corridor temperature being 75–80°F is irrelevant. Humidity and temperature are independent variables. Documented humidity levels in the North Tower corridors have been around 70%, exceeding ASHRAE 62.1 recommendations and building‑science thresholds for mold risk. The system is failing at dehumidification, not cooling.

5. The explanations offered in the blog post are technically incorrect Several claims made in the post do not withstand engineering scrutiny:

  • Stairwells have been unconditioned for 53 years and never caused humidity problems before 2015.
  • Ductwork has not changed since construction and did not cause humidity for four decades.
  • Unit thermostat settings do not increase corridor humidity.
  • Residents occasionally leaving doors open cannot explain humidity levels that persist 24 hours a day.
  • The real issue is the 2015 rooftop system, which was apparently not properly designed, selected or maintained for corridor humidity control.

6. The system was non‑functional for nearly 10 months Approximately two years ago, the corridor HVAC system was out of service for almost 10 months, with the Board and management repeatedly stating they apparently were “waiting for parts from Canada.” This prolonged outage significantly worsened humidity conditions and demonstrates a failure to maintain the system as required by law.

7. The $7 million cost narrative is misleading and unsupported The suggestion that humidity control requires a $7 million overhaul is not supported by any engineering report. Humidity control does not require new chillers, new ductwork, stairwell air‑conditioning, structural modifications, or multi‑million‑dollar redesigns. It requires the Association to repair or replace the failed rooftop HVAC equipment installed in 2015. Presenting extreme cost scenarios only serves to confuse owners and delay necessary action.

8. Government authorities investigate failures, not “complaints” If the City or DBPR becomes involved, it is because humidity exceeds safe limits and the corridor HVAC system is not functioning. Authorities investigate building conditions, not personalities. The implication that owners should avoid involving authorities is inappropriate and contrary to the purpose of regulatory oversight.

Required Board Action The steps the Board must take are straightforward and long overdue:

  1. Conduct a proper diagnosis of the failed rooftop HVAC system installed in 2015.
  2. Repair or replace the components responsible for inadequate dehumidification.
  3. Restore corridor humidity to safe levels (below 60%) as required by accepted standards.

These actions are not optional. They are statutory obligations.

Why This Matters to All Owners High humidity causes mold risk, corrosion, deterioration of finishes, increased electric bills, and shortened lifespan of in‑unit AC systems. This is a building‑health issue affecting every owner, not a matter of personal preference.

I welcome factual, engineering‑based discussion. However, the community must rely on accurate information. The North Tower humidity problem began only after the 2015 HVAC installation, persisted during a 10‑month system outage, and continues because the system is not performing its required dehumidification function. The Board must address this failure without further delay.

Respectfully,

Arkady Chase, PH5N

.o0o.

Realities of Parenting:

by Edith Pritchett, Washington Post, July 2026

.o0o.

Posted in Amenities, Board of Directors, Committees | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Response to previous postings regarding elevated humidity level

Posted on July 5, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

Response to previous postings regarding elevated humidity level at Aquarius common areas

 

Nathan Weinstein has prepared a number of observations regarding recent requests to reduce the humidity and temperature levels in the air-conditioned hallways of the Aquarius buildings.

Below you will find:

  • Nathan’s email authorizing the distribution of his comments.
  • A summary of his observations.
  • The complete, unabridged document discussing the humidity and temperature levels in the air-conditioned common areas of Aquarius.

    __________________________________

Hello Cecilio,

 

Can you please post my opinion regarding recent postings about elevated humidity levels on your blog?  I think we need to discuss this in our community, not just making requests and demands.

 

Thank you,

Nathan Weinstein, Unit 807S

__________________________________________

Abstract

This document addresses resident concerns regarding elevated temperature and humidity levels in the North Tower corridors. It explains that the building’s five-decade-old mechanical design, ongoing operational challenges with current equipment, and various building characteristics—such as unconditioned stairwells and vacant units—contribute to the cooling and dehumidification deficiencies. Instead of attempting immediate system adjustments, the author recommends conducting a comprehensive engineering feasibility study to identify the root causes and determine if modern environmental standards can realistically be achieved. Furthermore, the document cautions that implementing the necessary HVAC upgrades could result in a multi-million-dollar capital project requiring significant special assessments and owner approval. Ultimately, it urges the community to carefully evaluate the objective facts, professional engineering recommendations, and financial implications before committing to extensive renovations or inviting regulatory intervention.

 

_________________________________________

Response to previous postings regarding elevated humidity level

Nathan Weinstein, 807S

 

Response to previous postings regarding elevated humidity level

I would like to address the recent requests from Mr. Chase regarding the elevated humidity levels and temperatures in the North Tower corridors, as outlined in his letters to the Board and Property Manager.

The concern relates to corridor temperature and humidity conditions and the expectation that they meet certain recommended standards in Florida. In Florida condominium corridors, temperatures should ideally be maintained between 75°F and 80°F(we are currently in that range), and relative humidity should be held below 60%. While current elevated humidity levels are concerning it does not automatically trigger a requirement to replace the HVAC system with another meeting today’s new-construction standards since Aquarius buildings construction was conducted under different standards and requirements. Therefore any evaluation of corridor temperature and humidity should take into consideration the design limitations of the original building systems, as well as the performance and support issues associated with the currently installed HVAC equipment..

The following are some of several factors contributing to the current corridor HVAC system deficiencies from additional cooling loads on existing system:

  • The building stairwells that is not air-conditioned.
  • Existing ductwork is limited, and each corridor area is served by only two small air supply grilles at single location. 
  • Many apartments are occupied only part-time, with thermostats often set at 78°F or higher while owners are away taking some cooling loads from the corridors thus increasing the AC load for corridors.
  • Some residents occasionally leave their unit doors open, allowing conditioned air in corridors to escape and humid air to enter the corridors, placing additional load on the HVAC system.

In addition, the HVAC equipment installed on the roof approximately eight years ago appears to have been an unsuitable selection for the building’s needs. The equipment has presented ongoing maintenance challenges, and replacement parts are often difficult to obtain, with delivery times extending for weeks. The Board’s current objective is to mitigate the deficiencies of the existing HVAC system AHU’s in order to extend the useful life of the equipment. The existing AHUs are approaching the midpoint of their expected service life.

Before directing management and board to simply “make it happen and achieve better humidity levels” the community should first determine whether the desired humidity level can realistically be achieved within the constraints of the existing building design and what costs would be involved. Achieving corridor humidity levels near 60% may require extensive engineering evaluation and substantial upgrades.

A reasonable process would include the following steps:

  1. Comprehensive Engineering Feasibility Study (Estimated budget cost: in the range $30,000 to 45,000)  The Association would retain a qualified HVAC engineering firm to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the building and determine what modifications would be necessary to improve humidity control and whether the desired performance levels are achievable. Potential recommendations could include:
    • Additional ductwork and air distribution improvements.
    • Replacement of existing AHU’s, chillers.
    • Installation of dedicated outdoor air systems (DOAS), energy recovery systems (ERS), or other dehumidification equipment.
    • Installation of AC systems in the stairwells. 
  2. Engineering Design and Construction Documents (Estimated budget cost could range $350,000 to $450,000. Typically 5 to 10% of the project cost)

If the study concludes that the desired performance levels are achievable and the community wishes to precede, detailed engineering plans, design and construction documents would be required. 

  1. Construction and System Upgrades (Estimated budget cost could range from $4.5 million to $5.5 million. Engineering committee two years back had obtained contractors quote to replace one unit on roof at $650,000 w/o required structural, roofing and electrical work. With current price increases installation of one unit would put us around $1.2million. If we install 2-AHU and 2-ERV’s the cost would be in noted range): Based on preliminary assumptions, the project scope may include:
    • Replacement of existing AHU’s and chillers.
    • Installation of additional ductwork in hallways.
    • Pipe work
    • Structural modifications.
    • Roofing work.
    • Electrical upgrades.
    • Installation of additional dehumidification systems such as DOAS or ERS.
  2. Air Conditioning of Stairwells (Estimated budget cost: approximately $1 million.): If required as part of the humidity-control strategy additional equipment and infrastructure would likely be required. 

In summary: improving humidity control throughout the buildings may be technically possible, but it would likely require a major capital project involving significant engineering, construction, and financial commitments. Before pursuing such a project, the community should fully understand the technical feasibility, expected benefits, and overall costs involved. If the community believes that the current corridor humidity levels present a significant problem, and if owners are prepared to support the engineering studies, capital expenditures, and ready for potential special assessments required to address it, then we should begin the process without delay. However, everyone should understand that achieving modern humidity-control standards in a 53-year-old building would require substantial modifications and millions of dollars in expenditures close possibly to $7 million or more.

At present, the Association continues to maintain corridor temperatures reasonably close to the original design intent. The existing humidity levels, while not ideal, have existed for many years without evidence that they have created a building-wide mold problems requiring major remediation. At the same time, concerns raised by owners should not be dismissed. These concerns and requests as I understand had been relayed as complaints to the city inspectors.  We need to understand that if governmental authorities were to determine that corridor conditions require investigating potential corrective action, the Association could face additional obligations, including environmental testing, remediation efforts, and replacement of finishes such as carpeting, engineering studies and other potentially costly measures. Such work could be disruptive to residents, lengthy in time and expensive for the community. Therefore community should have a discussion focusing on facts, engineering evaluations, and the financial impact on all owners. Before committing to a major HVAC overhaul, and inviting outside officials the community should determine whether the expected benefits justify the costs and whether the desired humidity levels can realistically be achieved within the constraints of the existing buildings.

I welcome comments, corrections, suggestions, and opinions from fellow owners. If the community believes that a comprehensive HVAC modernization project is necessary, mainly to improve corridor humidity control, then we should openly discuss the scope, cost, funding options, and timeline required to accomplish it. Such decision to overhaul existing HVAC system would require a majority of the owners vote to support it.

Nathan Weinstein 

Unit 807S

.o0o.

Posted in Social | Leave a comment

Happy Fourth of July

Posted on July 4, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

Happy Fourth of July everyone!

.o0o.

Posted in Social | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Phantom Rules – Use of legal proceedings against Aquarius owner

Posted on June 30, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

The Phantom Rules – Use of legal proceedings against Aquarius owner

 

Abstract

This document analyzes a June 18, 2026 cease‑and‑desist letter issued by Aquarius Condominium Association’s outside counsel against a unit owner for an alleged “oversized pallet delivery.” The core finding is that the Association attempted to enforce delivery rules that did not exist in the governing 2020 House Manual—the only rules in effect at the time of the March 2026 delivery.

The letter claimed violations of unspecified “delivery procedures,” including elevator reservations, deposits, and prohibited staging areas. However, the 2020 Manual contains no delivery procedures, and its only relevant provision—§20’s reference to “bulky items”—is undefined and therefore unenforceable. As the document states: “The 2020 Manual uses the word ‘bulky’ once and defines it nowhere.”

Photographs and measurements of the delivered boxes show they were standard furniture cartons, hand‑carried, and not qualifying as “oversized” under any objective standard. The Association’s own proposed 2026 House Manual—circulated one week after the attorney’s letter—creates for the first time the very rules the Board claimed were already in effect, including definitions of oversized deliveries, equipment thresholds, and valet‑deck restrictions.

The document further notes that the Board president personally resolved the matter on March 7, 2026, attributing the issue to staff miscommunication: “Maybe a misunderstanding between ‘drop off’ and ‘delivery’… Regardless, calm discussion… is always better.”

The timing of the cease‑and‑desist letter—four months after the incident and shortly after the unit owner filed multiple protected complaints—raises concerns of retaliation under Florida Statute §718.1224.

Overall, the document concludes that the Association pursued enforcement without a legal basis, attempted retroactive rulemaking, and acted in a manner inconsistent with statutory requirements and its own president’s prior resolution.

This is the document prepared by Dr. Cooper, 1603N:


.o0o.

Posted in Governing Documents, Legal Issues, Management Office, Pictures | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Should we let Acqua Bistro at the Aquarius close?

Posted on June 29, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

Should we let Acqua Bistro at the Aquarius close?

Hi Cecilio


I don’t think many people are aware that Peter at the Acqua Bistro Restaurant will be leaving and closing the restaurant soon because the Board of Directors would not negotiate a fair agreement. Business has been exceptionally slow now since the entrance through the garage has been out of service for so long, people have to climb the ramp or steps and it is very difficult. Others call and think they are closed because they see the construction.


I myself have lived here for 25 years. The last nine years with his Restaurant here has been wonderful. All of the other restaurants failed. I had both my granddaughters’ bat mitzvahs, two birthday parties for my sister, a wedding engagement party for my granddaughter, a baby shower for my daughter in law, a surprise party for myself. My son got married here – all catered by Peter. He has always been so generous with his time and fair pricing, agreed with anything we asked him to do. It is heartbreaking that he will have to leave. Please can you get the word out to everyone through your newsletter or emails and let’s see what we can do to keep this from happening.

Thank you, Cecilio.

Sent from my iPhone
Roni Komie, LCSW, 1803S

.o0o.

Does this lesson applies to our condominium?

How Decline Quietly Begins

Would this make sense to Aquarius?

.o0o.

Posted in Social | Leave a comment

Happy Father’s Day

Posted on June 21, 2026 by Cecilio Augusto Berndsen

Happy Father’s Day


.o0o.

Posted in Social | Leave a comment
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started